Gavins Point Dam: ‘What Would It Take …?’

The Sioux City Journal posed some “What would it take …?” questions to officials today about area flooding. Here are the two questions that are most relevant to the Yankton area:

To raise the water level at Gavins Point Dam?

The water pool at Gavins Point Dam near Yankton, S.D., would have to increase by 3.6 feet to reach the top of the gates.

Jody Farhat, Chief of the Corps’ Missouri River Basin Water Management Division, said the dam’s reservoir level was at an elevation of 1207.4 feet Wednesday morning. The top of the gates is at 1210 feet.

“The pool is slightly higher than we like it,” she said. “We’d like it about a foot, maybe eight-tenths of a foot lower than it is now, but we’re not concerned about that.”

The corps has slowed releases from Fort Randall Dam near Pickstown, S.D., in order to lower the pool at Gavins Point. Releases at Fort Randall were held at 143,000 cubic feet per second Wednesday and are expected to be held to that amount again today before ramping up to the expected peak of 148,000 cfs.

To cause the corps to increase the release to more than the planned maximum of 150,000 cfs already being released from Gavins Point Dam?

The corps says it would take a lot of rain. How much, officials won’t or aren’t able to say.

Farhat said the corps would be forced to release more if “very heavy rains” fell across the upper Missouri River basin and filled up the rest of the storage in its six dams.

“Right now we don’t anticipate that happening,” Farhat said. “We’re looking at the forecast. We have the current rain built into that and also the snow (melt) and some cushion there. So, we’re pretty confident that we’re good at 150.”

One thought on “Gavins Point Dam: ‘What Would It Take …?’

  1. This is interesting but reminds me so much of KELO news. I saw they will be showing footage of flying over the river tonight at 10 from Dakota Dunes to the dam. I imagine they will be telling us:

    “No tornado’s currently on the nexrad doppler 8 million but if there were one the devastation would be horrendous here on the river. We’re talking Spencer type destruction, and remember KELO was on the scene in Spencer first thanks to our Nexrad doppler 8 billion. As you can see here on the river OH MY GOD IS THAT A FUNNEL CLOUD!?!?!?! No folks that’s just a tree, but had it been a funnel cloud the devestation would have been like Spencer….”

    I hate speculative news.
    Love your blog and thank you for reporting, but man I despise speculative “What if?” news.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s